[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(racoon 877) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?

To: tempdh@syrex.cc
Subject: (racoon 877) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:54:27 +0100
Cc: racoon@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon-archive@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon-outgo@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon@kame.net
In-reply-to: <200412280612.iBS6CHEc021421@unix-01.lair.co.za>
References: <200412280612.iBS6CHEc021421@unix-01.lair.co.za>
Reply-to: racoon@kame.net
Sender: owner-racoon@kame.net

Hi,

Am Di, den 28.12.2004 schrieb David Herselman um 7:12:
> Is the NAT-T code by any chance still 'unstable' and thus not included in
> the stock RHEL3 kernel? Is there anything else I can try to get this to
> work?
> 
> PS: I am using esp transport...
AFAIK NAT-T is only supported for tunnel mode in the Linux kernel 2.6.
Therefore transport mode is probably not supported in the rhel stock
kernel either.

Ralf
-- 
Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>

Follow-Ups:
- (racoon 879) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@arin.net>

References:
- (racoon 875) Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: "David Herselman" <tempdh@syrex.cc>

Prev by Date: (racoon 876) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by Date: (racoon 879) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Previous by thread: (racoon 876) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by thread: (racoon 879) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread