[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(racoon 879) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?

To: racoon@kame.net
Subject: (racoon 879) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@arin.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:29:42 -0500
Delivered-to: racoon-archive@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon-outgo@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon@kame.net
In-reply-to: <1104227667.3595.1.camel@bibo.spenneberg.de>
References: <200412280612.iBS6CHEc021421@unix-01.lair.co.za> <1104227667.3595.1.camel@bibo.spenneberg.de>
Reply-to: racoon@kame.net
Sender: owner-racoon@kame.net

On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 04:54, Ralf Spenneberg wrote:

> AFAIK NAT-T is only supported for tunnel mode in the Linux kernel 2.6.

That's wrong. Racoon doesn't support it. I have everything set up and
running with Openswan and standard Linux 2.6.9. 

> Therefore transport mode is probably not supported in the rhel stock
> kernel either.

I like racoon, but in this case only openswan might do the trick. 

> Ralf

wogri

-- 
wogri@arin.net
www.arin.net

Follow-Ups:
- (racoon 882) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>
- (racoon 880) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@free.fr>

References:
- (racoon 875) Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: "David Herselman" <tempdh@syrex.cc>
- (racoon 877) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>

Prev by Date: (racoon 877) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by Date: (racoon 880) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Previous by thread: (racoon 877) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by thread: (racoon 880) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread