[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(racoon 882) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?

To: racoon@kame.net
Subject: (racoon 882) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:19:38 +0100
Delivered-to: racoon-archive@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon-outgo@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon@kame.net
In-reply-to: <1104323382.34784.1.camel@wogrissium.arin.net.>
References: <200412280612.iBS6CHEc021421@unix-01.lair.co.za> <1104227667.3595.1.camel@bibo.spenneberg.de> <1104323382.34784.1.camel@wogrissium.arin.net.>
Reply-to: racoon@kame.net
Sender: owner-racoon@kame.net

Am Mi, den 29.12.2004 schrieb Wolfgang Hennerbichler um 13:29:
> On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 04:54, Ralf Spenneberg wrote:
> 
> > AFAIK NAT-T is only supported for tunnel mode in the Linux kernel 2.6.
> 
> That's wrong. Racoon doesn't support it. I have everything set up and
> running with Openswan and standard Linux 2.6.9. 
No, Racoon from the ipsec-tools starting version 0.3.3 definitly
supports it!

Cheers,

Ralf
-- 
Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>

Follow-Ups:
- (racoon 884) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@arin.net>

References:
- (racoon 875) Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: "David Herselman" <tempdh@syrex.cc>
- (racoon 877) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>
- (racoon 879) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@arin.net>

Prev by Date: (racoon 881) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by Date: (racoon 883) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Previous by thread: (racoon 888) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by thread: (racoon 884) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread