[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(racoon 887) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?

To: racoon@kame.net
Subject: (racoon 887) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
From: Matt Titus <titus@nttmcl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:02:57 -0800
Delivered-to: racoon-archive@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon-outgo@kame.net
Delivered-to: racoon@kame.net
In-reply-to: <1104344936.56877.2.camel@wogrissium.arin.net.>
References: <200412280612.iBS6CHEc021421@unix-01.lair.co.za> <1104227667.3595.1.camel@bibo.spenneberg.de> <1104323382.34784.1.camel@wogrissium.arin.net.> <20041229144620.GA2425@zen.inc> <1104336500.34784.11.camel@wogrissium.arin.net.> <1104340819.4195.9.camel@bibo.spenneberg.de> <1104344936.56877.2.camel@wogrissium.arin.net.>
Reply-to: racoon@kame.net
Sender: owner-racoon@kame.net
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040319

Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:

On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 18:20 +0100, Ralf Spenneberg wrote:

Using KLIPS or the native IPsec Stack?

Using the native IPsec Stack - the official kernel from kernel.org without any further patches.

How did the implementers address the IPR issues? Microsoft and Cisco (at least) still have patent claims pertaining to NAT traversal and UDP encapsulation.

Matt Titus

Follow-Ups:
- (racoon 888) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: manu@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus)

References:
- (racoon 875) Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: "David Herselman" <tempdh@syrex.cc>
- (racoon 877) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>
- (racoon 879) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@arin.net>
- (racoon 880) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@free.fr>
- (racoon 881) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@arin.net>
- (racoon 883) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Ralf Spenneberg <lists@spenneberg.org>
- (racoon 885) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
  - From: Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri@arin.net>

Prev by Date: (racoon 886) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by Date: (racoon 888) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Previous by thread: (racoon 885) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Next by thread: (racoon 888) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread