[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(racoon 897) RE: "DOI value of CONNECTED Notify Message has problem"
- To: "'Satoshi Inoue'" <inoue@ntes.ipv6.nec.co.jp>
- Subject: (racoon 897) RE: "DOI value of CONNECTED Notify Message has problem"
- From: "Haoda" <haoda@ysh.com.cn>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:55:43 +0900
- Cc: <haoda@64translator.com>, <racoon@kame.net>
- Delivered-to: racoon-archive@kame.net
- Delivered-to: racoon-outgo@kame.net
- Delivered-to: racoon@kame.net
- In-reply-to: <20050114201926.7e25ca08.inoue@ntes.ipv6.nec.co.jp>
- Reply-to: racoon@kame.net
- Sender: owner-racoon@kame.net
- Thread-index: AcT6Ku+uwgdnvjUDSQGN0eOlfiACHwAAw/fw
Inoue-san,
Hi!
Thanks.
I agree with your option, but I think it is different from the
test case which wrote in my previous email.
In my test case, the second step, responder only reply with a
message its commit bit equals 0, but in your figure, I think
its value maybe 1.
I think our test specification is matched with RFC. Do you think it is
acceptable?
BTW, would you like tell me the meaning of AM/QM? I am not clear to it.
Regard,
Haoda